And The Oscar Goes To…


The best time of the year has passed and now we have to go into the rest of the year Oscar-less. So let’s celebrate the lucky select few that walked away with that famous golden statuette and let’s celebrate the incredible strong year in film. I’m sure that phrase has been used before in previous years however I truly believe that 2017 was a best year for film for a long time. Having films like Lady Bird and Get Out breaking the mound there was a lot to celebrate this year.

Even though there were some certainties I would have generally been happy if it had gone either way and there was a feeling this awards season that there was a true love for all films nominated because it was a groundbreaking year for film.

What I love about this year is that the Oscar winners (in the acting categories in particular) were seasoned actors and I love how the Academy recognised actors who have been around for a long time who have had an incredible career and won this year for powerful performances.

The Shape of Water (4 wins)

Best Motion Picture of the Year (Guillermo del Toro, J. Miles Dale)

Best Achievement in Directing (Guillermo del Toro)

Best Achievement in Music Written for the Motion Pictures – Original Score (Alexandre Desplat)

Best Achievement in Production Design (Paul D. Austerberry, Shane Vieau, Jeffrey A. Melvin)

This is a passion project for Guillermo del Toro who has always stood up for monsters and in this film in particular he speaks out for love and fairytales. Even though this wasn’t my favourite film out of the Best Picture nominees I do admire Toro’s artistry and vision for the film and I would actually like to watch it again because there were some strong themes and the ending was powerful. Now Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri had won at the BAFTAs and Golden Globes for Best Picture so I was expecting that film to win however The Shape of Water did receive 13 nominations and has received a lot of love this awards season so I was still happy with the result.

I’m so happy for Alexandre Desplat winning his second Oscar, the music in the film was almost like another character and was so lush and beautiful; perfectly capturing that Golden Age of Hollywood.

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri (2 wins)

Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role (Frances McDormand)

Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role (Sam Rockwell)

I loved this film. Bold, strong, darkly comical with powerhouse performances from its cast. That’s why I was so happy with Sam Rockwell winning his first Oscar and especially happy with Frances McDormand winning her second Oscar (first win was Fargo in 1997), It’s great to see a seasoned actor rewarded in this way and she showed us why she is the great actress that she is. Also can she get a 3rd Oscar for her incredible speech please?! Best speech of the awards season for demanding equality and sharing her moment other other female nominees. Well deserved win for McDormand.

Now Three Billboards did win Best British Film and Best Film at the BAFTAs as well as Best Motion Picture – Drama at the Golden Globes so I was expecting for it to win at the Oscars but again with it being such a strong year for film I’m happy either way.

Darkest Hour (2 wins)

Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role (Gary Oldman)

Best Achievement in Makeup and Hairstyling (Kazuhiro Tsuji, David Malinowski, Lucy Sibbick)

My least favourite film of the year, however Gary Oldman rightly won the Oscar for his powerful and transformative performance as Winston Churchill. He had been nominated previously for the first time in 2012 for Tinker Tailer Soldier Spy (2011) and after having an incredibly successful career many were surprised he hadn’t won before so it was great seeing him being rewarded in this way.

Coco (2 wins)

Best Animated Film (Lee Unkrich, Darla K. Anderson)

Best Achievement in Music Written for Motion Pictures – Original Song – “Remember Me” (Kristen Anderson-Lopez, Robert Lopez)

I’m so glad I managed to watch Coco a couple of weeks ago! One of Pixar’s best outings which was emotionally poignant and I loved how respectful they were of the Mexican culture. Now I knew the film would win Best Animation but a pleasant surprise was winning for Best song. As a song itself “Remember Me” is not the strongest in the category, many people thought “This is Me” from The Greatest Showman would win, however in context “Remember Me” is powerful and in that case I’m really happy it won. Not to mention it’s the Lopez’s second Oscar win after winning in the same category for “Let it Go” from Frozen (2013) 4 years ago so well done to them!

Blade Runner 2049 (2 wins)

Best Achievement in Cinematography (Roger Deakins)

Best Achievement in Visual Effects (John Nelson, Gerd Nefzer, Paul Lambert, Richard R. Hoover)

Blade Runner 2049 was my favourite film of 2017 and I’m glad it received recognition for its strong visual elements. I would have loved more recognition in other directors (Denis Villeneuve was nominated Best Director at the BAFTAs at least) but at least it won some awards.

Most notably for Deakins who had FINALLY won as he had previously been nominated 13 times. So I’m glad he finally got recognised and especially for visually lush film like Blade Runner 2049.

Get Out (1 win)

Best Original Screenplay (Jordan Peele)

Jordan Peele made history on Oscar night for being the first African-American to win Best Original Screenplay. I’m so happy Get Out won an Oscar; the film had been nominated 4 Oscars (including Best Picture) bearing in mind it came out in February 2017 so that’s amazing.

Get Out is layered and with multiple viewings you’ll get more out of the film and you’ll love it even more. That’s down to Peele and his Screenplay so I’m happy for his Oscar win.

I, Tonya (1 win)

Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role (Allison Janney)

I, Tonya is a bold, brash, comedy/drama and I’m glad Margot Robbie was nominated for her incredible performance as Tonya Harding and in a another year she could have won, but this film was a moment for Allison Janney who has had a long and exciting career so this was her moment and a well deserved one as that. When you watch her in I, Tonya you realise it’s such a transformative role and you see how talented and amazing Janney is in that role.

Call Me by your Name (1 win)

Best Adapted Screenplay (James Ivory)

James Ivory, at the age of 89, became the oldest Oscar winner ever (having previously been nominated as Best Director 3 times) so it was a huge moment for him. It was an emotional moment when he was thanking people he had worked with who had recently passed which shows he’s had a long and successful career and he was rightly recognised for the Oscar this year.

Special Mentions:

(Phantom Thread)

Phantom Thread had been nominated for 6 Oscars (including Best Motion Picture) and it was one of my favourite films of the year, so thankfully it didn’t walk away empty handed as it won for Best Achievement in Costume Design (Mark Bridges) which was his second Oscar win after winning for The Artist (2011) 6 years ago. He even won a speedboat for the shortest Oscar speech so he was the big winner so well done to him!

Dunkirk won 3 Oscars for the technical awards (Sound and Film Editing) which it deserved however because I found the film quite boring I wasn’t really invested with the wins.

Also I’m proud I guessed 15 of the Oscar wins correctly against my friend who guessed 12 correctly so well done me!


Misconceptions of a Young Film Fanatic

This blog post is to confront various ideas people may have regarding young people and their tastes in film and how they can misconceived. This post may also seem like I am ranting (which is true in a sense) but they are based on things I’ve heard so I thought I would write something in response. I understand that not all young people have the same taste in film and that my taste is more diverse than most; however it’s frustrating when you hear about certain stereotypes people have regarding young people and their interest in film. I’m going to list a few things that I’ve heard people say and counteract them from my perspective as a film fanatic.




Roman Holiday (1953)

Now I’m sure there are young people who may not love classic film, however to assume that majority of young people are dismissive of films made pre-2000 is insulting. To limit myself to films of the past decade is criminal because some of the greatest films were made over 70 years ago and it allows you to have a broader sense of what film is. Some of my favourite films include Casablanca (1942), Gone with the Wind (1939), Roman Holiday (1953), Citizen Kane (1941), Singin’ in the Rain (1952), Rebel Without a Cause (1955) and the list goes one. To see what has come before is insightful to see what kind of films were made in the past and how they can have a life of their own beyond their release date. I’m on a life long quest of watching more classic films because I want to have the broadest film taste possible and that doesn’t happen from watching only films released in 2017.

There are young people out there who know James Stewart, Orson Welles, Audrey Hepburn, Vivien Leigh and their films; so don’t be shocked when a young person says they love Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1961). We do know more films outside the Transformers live action film franchise.




Rear Window (1954)

I’ve seen my fair share of Hitchcock films and obviously know what a revered filmmaker he is; I watched his films expecting to be blown away by this auteur and why cinema has held him in high regard. Yet when I watched some of his films I was actually not impressed: The Birds (1963) or Rear Window (1954) for example are seen as classics yet they both didn’t grab me nor interest me. Now that’s not because they were released in the 50’s and 60’s but in the case of Rear Window I felt the film dragged and The Birds was not as exciting as I thought it would be and the ending was frustrating.

It’s just because I’ve had people say to me that I probably didn’t like a classic film because it’s “dated” and that frustrates for various reasons. One is that I am able to watch a film objectively and know the context, that it was made in a different time and film has changed and secondly a true classic is one that can stand the test of time. Citizen Kane is an example where I watched it and was hooked because it had a modern feel in narrative structure (I know at the time it was groundbreaking and many films followed suit) and the mystery was exciting of finding out more about the titular character. So it IS possible to enjoy and NOT enjoy a classic film.




The Devil Wears Prada (2006)

First of all the term “chick flick” is outdated like many opinions of what films either gender should enjoy. It’s 2018 and I’m sure we’re past the point where if a man says he enjoyed Pitch Perfect (2012) it shouldn’t be a groundbreaking concept to comprehend. However I hear it all the time when people refer to a romantic comedy or musical where they say, “It may be too girly for you” or “I know it’s a chick flick but…” and those phrases are dated to which I dismiss any idea that I am incapable of enjoying film because of my gender. A quality film is a quality film and a great film will be able to allow varying demographics to engage with the film. Yes a film may have a target audience but that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be abnormal for another type of audience to also enjoy the film. I love films such as The Devil Wears Prada (2006) and 500 Days of Summer (2009) as well because they are more than one thing and I think there’s something in those films for everyone.

The same goes for when we say women may not enjoy the Fast and Furious franchise because it’s a “guys film”, again an outdated and excluding phrase. As I said before, I believe and hope we have moved on from stereotyping and putting people’s film tastes in certain boxes but it’s still something I hear often and people need to be more open minded.




45 Years (2015)

The way to enjoy a film is to find something within a certain character or themes that are raised that you can connect with no matter what the subject matter. One film that comes to mind is 45 Years (2015) with Oscar nominee Charlotte Rampling. I love that film. The film focuses on an elderly couple reminiscing about their lives together and who they were in their youth, but somehow I was immersed in the film because there was conviction in the performances and I loved contemplating about how would I look back at my life in the future. A quality film is one that engages the audience and is told with conviction, the fact that it focuses on a couple well into their married lives should not exclude other demographics.

Also another film is The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel (2011) which is a feel good film showcasing the best of British talent (Oscar winners Judi Dench and Maggie Smith, Golden Globe winner Bill Nighy and Oscar nominee Tom Wilkinson) and again focuses on how perceptive on life changes as we age and allows the audience (no matter what age) to think about life in general.  Plus it’s just a great, fun, colourful film in general.

Point is that I’m sure I’m not the only young person that can appreciate a film focusing on leading characters who are older, because just like how watching classic films broadens your taste so does watching films that allow you to step into someone else’s world.


Singin’ in the Rain (1952)

I’m sure there are many more stereotypes of young people and film (if so feel free to comment) but I think it applies to everyone when I say don’t assume that a certain person may not enjoy a certain film; we all have different film taste and it’s always refreshing and exciting when one subverts people’s expectations and show how you can be open minded with what we watch.

The Good Showman

The Greatest Showman (2017) may have earned a 54% on Rotten Tomatoes (Branding the film as ROTTEN) however it has struck a chord with audiences grossing over $237 million worldwide (against an $84 million production budget). The majority of people I know who have seen the film absolutely love it and have seen it multiple times; it’s great to see how the film has had such an impact and brought joy to people.

The reason for this blog post is because I’ve heard people raving about The Greatest Showman and some have even compared it to the Oscar winning La La Land (2016) by saying it’s a stronger musical. To set the record straight I did like The Greatest Showman but if people suggest that it is a better musical than La La Land...then I don’t know what else to say than in my opinion it’s not. First of all they are different films but if I had to compare La La Land is my favourite of the two.

I’ll start by saying what I enjoyed about The Greatest Showman: the soundtrack is a solid effort from Oscar winners Benj Pasek and Justin Paul delivering some standout original songs. I love the Golden Globe winning/Oscar nominated song “This Is Me”, “The Greatest Show”, “The Other Side”, “Never Enough” and “Rewrite the Stars”. The positive thing about this film is that it is assured in its identity as a musical that is meant to inject joy into audiences, it doesn’t try to be anything else and is clear in what its meant to be.


Secondly, Hugh Jackman (who was nominated a Golden Globe for his role as P.T. Barnum) carried the film effortlessly on his shoulders. You can understand why because he was passionate about the role even to the point where he was involved in getting the project made for seven years! Hugh is no stranger to musicals on screen (he was nominated an Oscar for his performance in Les Miserables – 2012) and he relishes in bringing P.T. Barnum to the screen to bring audiences together for a fun ride.

Lastly it’s great how the film explores the themes of acceptance and embracing everyone from all different walks of life (which is encapsulated so well in the song “This Is Me”). Whilst it may have been done in a sugary affair, it’s still an important theme and a one that I believe has resonated with audiences, especially in such a divided world.


However, the difference between La La Land and The Greatest Showman is that the former is stronger in every area of the film whereas the latter may be strong in its identity as a musical but as a story and character development it’s lacking. I understand you can’t approach The Greatest Showman as a full on biopic otherwise it may be a more morbid affair but in being brash in its musicality it does suffer from there being any grounded nature to the film and in turn it feels more lightweight. The film is definitely more about the songs than anything else. Also to compare numbers: La La Land grossed over $446 million worldwide (against a $30 million budget) and scored 92% on Rotten Tomatoes (Branding the film as FRESH). On top of wowing audiences AND critics the film had a clean sweep at the Golden Globes winning seven awards (the most won by a single film) and won six Academy Awards last year.

Now with La La Land it’s more intimate as it follows mainly two characters: Mia (Oscar winner Emma Stone) and Sebastian (Oscar nominee Ryan Gosling) in their relationship and their journey of trying to follow their dreams. The film starts off strong in embracing its identity as a musical with big songs such as “Another Day of Sun” and “Someone In The Crowd” however it doesn’t shy away from having tonal shifts to embrace the more real elements of life without it feeling jarring.


I love how it is a full on musical but also an more focused film in terms of pacing and character study. The film evolves at its own pacing which doesn’t feel forced or rushed and then it becomes more about the decisions the characters have to make about their futures and reviewing their hopes and desires. One of my favourite scenes is when Sebastian surprises Mia with a meal when he comes home from tour, it’s a conversational scene where everything is explored (regarding where they’ve come from and where they hope to be in the future) that becomes an argument in a very mature and organic way. The dialogue doesn’t feel overtly sentimental or emotional, the tone is just right. The film can be strong in its musical scenes as well as its character scenes.

Also I love how throwback La La Land is, it has a strong Singin’ in the Rain (1952) vibe and the jazz infused soundtrack is classic and beautiful. Even the instrumental tracks are soothing and exciting, especially the “Epilogue” score. The Oscar winning cinematography is stunning with the vibrant colours and and striking settings (most notably when Mia and Sebastian first dance together after the party they’ve been to and when inside the Planetarium).  Not to mention the incredible Epilogue scene which was very bittersweet, giving the audiences what could have been whilst being bold by saying life doesn’t always go as planned.


At the end of the day it’s all subjective and down to personal taste. For me The Greatest Showman was a good musical, but nothing more. Where as La La Land for me has so many layers, classic songs and visuals and Oscar winning acting/direction/cinematography. They are both different films in what they are representing and to both of their credit they are original musicals which is always welcome. By all means say how much you enjoyed The Greatest Showman but personally I don’t think it’s the masterpiece audiences have made it out to be.

Feel free to share your opinions!

Oscars 2018 – The Nominations

Bear with me as this may not be the slickest blog post entry but I have so many emotions about this years nominees that I had to rush release a blog post. So overall I’m happy with the nominees; films like Lady Bird, Get Out, Three Billboards outside Ebbing, Missouri got a lot of love. Yet some films such as Molly’s Game, All the Money in the World, Florida Project and Detroit got sorely overlooked. Even though Stronger wasn’t the “strongest” film Jake Gyllenhaal should have been nominated and was sadly omitted from the list of nominees.

Here are the list of new nominees for the major categories and my thoughts on them.


Call Me by Your Name
Darkest Hour
Get Out
Lady Bird
Phantom Thread
The Post
The Shape of Water
Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri

I’m really happy for Get Out, Three Billboards outside Ebbing, Missouri, Lady Bird and The Shape of Water as they’re my favourites. I’ll admit I still need to see Lady Bird and The Shape of Water however I think Three Billboards will win as it won the Golden Globe for Best Film – Drama and has been getting a lot of love this awards season. I’d be happy with that result.


Timothée Chalamet,
Call Me By Your Name

Daniel Day-Lewis, Phantom Thread

Daniel Kaluuya, Get Out

Gary Oldman, Darkest Hour

Denzel Washington, Roman J. Israel, Esq.

Gary Oldman will win the Oscar. Easy call to make. But I’m pleasantly surprised by Daniel Kaluuya bring included in the list. Though I have to ask where is Tom Hanks (The Post) and Jake Gyllenhaal (Stronger)? In any case Oldman was always going to win but it’s still sad Hanks and Gyllenhaal we’re overlooked.


Sally Hawkins,
The Shape of Water

Frances McDormand, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri

Margot Robbie, I, Tonya

Saoirse Ronan, Lady Bird

Meryl Streep, The Post

Where is Chastain and Williams?!?! Chastain gave a career best performance in Molly’s Game. Both Chastain and Williams were nominated Golden Globes for their respective roles, but still! That being said as much as I’d love Ronan to win (this is her 3rd nominated at the age of only 23!) McDormand will and should win.


Dunkirk, Christopher Nolan

Get Out, Jordan Peele

Lady Bird, Greta Gerwig

Phantom Thread, Paul Thomas Anderson

The Shape of Water, Guillermo del Toro

It’s great seeing the Academy Awards more inclusive in their directing category; so happy for Greta Gerwig! This is refreshing as she wasn’t included in the Best Directors list for the Golden Globes or BAFTA Film Awards and also makes her the fifth female director nominated ever. Also I’m happy Jordan Peele has been nominated because it’s his directorial debut and he created a fresh original film with something to say. Even though I’m happy for Nolan yet Dunkirk shouldn’t have been his first directing nomination (Inception should have been). Guillermo del Toro has been nominated for his passion project which I’m excited to see when it’s released in the UK.


Mary J. Blige,

Allison Janney, I, Tonya

Lesley Manville, Phantom Thread

Laurie Metcalf, Lady Bird

Octavia Spencer, The Shape of Water

Allison Janney will win; I can’t wait to see I, Tonya. I’m also Happy for Octavia Spencer as well. Mary J. Blige was good but there Mudbound had better/overlooked performances.



Willem Dafoe, The Florida Project

Woody Harrelson, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri

Richard Jenkins, The Shape of Water

Christopher Plummer, All the Money in the World

Sam Rockwell, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri

Again, Defoe was good but not the best thing about Florida Project which was overlooked. Sam Rockwell’s character was perfectly crafted by Martin McDonagh and I’m so pleasantly surprised to see Woody Harrelson nominated as well as his character was powerful and poignant.


Call Me By Your Name, James Ivory

The Disaster Artist, Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber

Logan, Scott Frank, James Mangold, Michael Green

Molly’s Game, Aaron Sorkin

Mudbound, Virgil Williams and Dee Rees

Sadly Molly’s Game sole nomination but a worthy one at that. Jessica Chastain delivered his words perfectly!


The Big Sick, Emily V. Gordon and Kumail Nanjiani

Get Out, Jordan Peele

Lady Bird, Greta Gerwig

The Shape of Water, Guillermo del Toro and Vanessa Taylor

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri, Martin McDonagh

McDonagh won the Golden Globe for this category so time will tell; but Get Out and Lady Bird are strong contenders as well.

So even with the unfortunate omissions from the nominees list I’m still happy overall and think it’ll be an exciting Oscar night come March 4th 2018.


Top 10 Films of 2017

2017 has been an interesting year for film. It has been a strong year for original films such as Get Out and Baby Driver yet a disappointment when it comes to hyped up blockbusters (with Wonder Woman being the exception). So compiling a list of my favourite films released in 2017 was a tricky one but it made me see that it’s been a great year for independent films and films that have an original story.

Now just to clarify, this list features films released in the UK during the year of 2017. Another disclaimer is that I of course haven’t watched every film released in the UK during the year of 2017 meaning if you think there is an omission from the list it may be because I haven’t watched it.

I’ll start from number 10 and count down to reveal which film I would label as the best film of 2017.


10. Get Out


I was a bit skeptical about this film as I tend not to draw towards horror films so I didn’t see it when it was released in cinemas. However by the critical acclaim and positive responses from audiences that deemed it more than just a “horror film” but a film with a clear message and that had something to say. So when I watched it I was pleasantly surprised how it broke through the label of a “horror film” and managed to make people think and engage in dialogue after the film had finished. Get Out could have been fleshed out a little bit more but I commend the film on its originality and its boldness.

9. The Killing of a Sacred Deer


The Lobster (2015) was awful. However when I heard Oscar winner Nicole Kidman was in Yorgos Lanthimos’ new film I kept an open mind to this film; not to mention the trailer and concept of the film seemed mysterious and fascinating. It may not be for everyone, but I love and appreciate Yorgos’ assertiveness as a filmmaker and the fact he has a clear vision and does not compromise. The film can be hard to watch at times and is “out there” but it works in this film and all the cast pull it off brilliantly. Speaking of star performances; Barry Keoghan was so good in this film and played the enigmatic character of Martin so well. If you want to switch up your film taste and watch something unconventional; The Killing of a Sacred Deer is perfect for you.

8. mother!


Again, a very unique and unconventional film. mother! has had a lot of controversy and attention for a whole load of reasons and I knew going into it that the film would be nothing like I’ve seen…but I think if people stood back and took a breath there is something here and something to be admired and appreciated. Oscar winner Jennifer Lawrence can do no wrong; she plays against character at the start and then she comes into her own as the film progresses and when it escalates very quickly. Oscar nominated director Darren Aronofsky is unapologetic about his vision and what he wants to say and that’s what I admire about him and appreciate about this film. This is not a film that you love or hate, it’s a film that provokes an audience. It’s refreshing to see a film go against the mould of the current state of the film industry be proud about it.

7. Thor: Ragnarok


One of the few blockbusters that I actually enjoyed this year. I have a love/hate relationship with Marvel nowadays because they have become so convoluted; yet Thor: Ragnarok felt fresh and more concise than previous MCU entries. Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016) director Taika Waititi brings his fresh and colourful sense of humour to this film to make it stand out. Yes this film does feature that forced Marvel sense of humour but the scenes in particular with Thor and The Hulk are ripe with Waititi’s witty dialogue. We have to talk about Oscar winner Cate Blanchett who easily stole the show (I’m praying for a spin-off film of her character Hela) and is hands down one of the best Marvel villains to date. So if you’ve grown tired and weary from the MCU (and I don’t blame you) give this film a chance.

6. Lion

Dev Patel stars in LION

Inspiring. That’s all I need to say about Lion. The first half containing a phenomenal performance from first time actor and one of the cutest child actors ever: Sunny Pawar playing young Saroo. Then comes along Oscar nominee Dev Patel who plays adult Saroo and gives a career best, not to mention he holds up his own in scenes against Oscar winner Nicole Kidman and Oscar nominee Rooney Mara. This film is full of heartbreak and joy, featuring themes of belonging and identity. Lion is an inspiring story that you can’t believe is true.

5. The Beguiled


Oscar winner Nicole Kidman. Golden Globe nominee Kirsten Dunst. Elle Fanning. Oscar winner Sophia Coppola directing. These are reasons enough to watch this film. Sophia knows how to make a lean and clean cut film that gives enough tension and mystery without it becoming self indulgent. That’s all I need to say about this film. Basically it’s really good.

4. Wonder Woman


One of the few blockbusters that actually was quality and had substance. Gal Gadot is perfect as Diana; so authentic and natural in her performance and with her character standing up for what’s right and not accepting anything else but justice. One of the most refreshing superhero films in a long time; because for once it was a superhero film solely about the eponymous character and not featuring a million other superheroes. Patty Jenkins directed an incredible film that focused purely on Diana coming from an island of perfection and having the character evolve as the film progressed to have a rounded and more balanced view of humanity and what her purpose in life is. Three words: No Man’s Land.

3. Baby Driver

Ansel Elgort;Jon Hamm;Jamie Foxx;Eiza Gonzalez

Edgar Wright delivers one of the most vibrant and exciting original films of the year. Golden Globe nominee Ansel Elgort charismatically carries the weight of the film on his shoulders with notable supporting forces from Oscar winner Jamie Fox and Lily James. Baby Driver has you thinking it’s one thing but then it swerves in a different direction. The whole vibe of the film is so cool and smooth and will definitely stay with you after you watch it.

2. La La Land


La La Land is reminiscent of Hollywood musicals such as Singin’ in the Rain (1952) and yet is relevant to todays audience, enabling it to have its own identity. The film features one of the best soundtracks from Justin Hurwitz, Benji Pasek and Justin Paul but the genius of the film is how it is very character driven and how the tone of the films is effortlessly handled as the film progresses. This Oscar winning, instant classic, musical masterpiece has depth and fully rounded characters and is a film that you have to watch right now.

1. Blade Runner 2049


As soon as I watched this film I knew it would be my favourite film of the year. Oscar nominee Ryan Gosling is of course a great actor but I have to say, he gives one of his best performances in Blade Runner 2049. He’s a very internal actor and everything is said through his facial expressions and that’s a powerful tool to master. In a year where I’ve been let down by blockbusters, Blade Runner 2049 came along and showed everyone how it should be done: thought provoking, sophisticated, creating the right tone and pace and having a great story. Yes the film is nearly 3 hours long but it was very engrossing and captivating that it didn’t feel that long at all. Denis Villeneuve always has great quality and class to his films, which is why he was the right director for the job to carry on the legacy of Blade Runner (1982). I was always excited for this film but it exceeded my expectations and I’m happy to say that Blade Runner 2049 was my favourite film of 2017.

Now I’m being picky but the reason why La La Land didn’t make number 1 was because whilst it was released in the UK in 2017 its original release was in 2016. It made the list but Blade Runner 2049 was released in October 2017 and therefore is a worthy number 1. 


So there you have it. I have given an overview of my favourite films of 2017 and I’m already looking forward to what 2018 has to offer.

Please feel free to comment on what your favourite films have been this year!

3 Standout Blockbusters Of 2017

2017 has so far led me to become a blockbuster cynic who can only enjoy art house films, however there have been a few blockbusters that may save me from that fate. I truly believe that a great film can be delivered in the form of a high budget product because at the end of the day as long as the story and characters are engaging then that’s all that matters. Blockbusters can have depth or they are designed to switch off your brain and just enjoy them for what they are.

Here are three blockbusters that stood out for me this year for various reasons:

The Film X-Men Origins Should Have Been


Now I’m going to say something controversial: I actually enjoyed X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009). It’s a fun, standard blockbuster. However unfortunately it is highly regarded as an embarrassment of the X-Men franchise; so that’s why I say Logan is the film that I’m sure people feel best portrayed Wolverine. So we’ve had the false start, the better but still not perfect Wolverine (2013) so in 2017 we see Hugh Jackman let go and embrace the character of Wolverine completely.

When I heard that Logan was going to be stripped back, showing “Old Man Logan” and that it was going to intentionally stand apart from the typical comic book film, I was excited. Finally a comic book film was going to take a risk and show how much can be achieved within the genre.

Logan was a solid effort which not only proved that a superhero film can have depth and be complex, but it also was a credible film in its own right. It was refreshing. That’s why I’m including Logan in this blog post about how it was a standout blockbuster, yet there was something in me from raving about it. This is not a criticism, but it by being very purposeful in being something else it almost felt calculated. Not to mention that the film could have shaved some time off because towards the end the heavy tone started to take a toll.

Overall, I still respect that director James Mangold and leading start Hugh Jackman stood out and were bold and took a risk with this film. I can’t fault them on that and that’s why I like the film. Hopefully it’ll inspire other comic book films to show the scope that you can cover within that “genre”. It certainly has worked as Logan has grossed over $612 worldwide and has received a 93% Rotten Tomato rating, what a great way to see Hugh Jackman wave goodbye to a role of a lifetime.

Fast and Furious 8


I didn’t even come up with a witty subheading, that’s how easy going and fun Fast and Furious 8 is. I’ve always been cynical of the Fast and Furious franchise for being hollow and brainless (and this is coming from the guy who enjoyed the Michael Bay directed Transformers films), so I stayed away from the film series with no plan to watch them. However, after viewing the eighth instalment with a friend I was happy to be proven wrong. It was fun, brash, crazy, exciting and even though the characters weren’t exactly fleshed out they were formed in a way that allowed us as an audience to care for them and invest in them.

Up until that point no blockbuster this year allowed me to completely let go and suspend my disbelief to enjoy the ride. Does the franchise deserve to gross over $1 billion worldwide? maybe not. That being said, the reason why fans have responded to these films are because these films are the essence of what a blockbuster should be: crazy action and a true form of escapism. I have to give credit to Vin Diesel to producing a film series that has connected with audiences all across the world, not taking things too seriously and just having fun with these characters and crazy adventures.

Winning Wonder Woman


76 years later after the world was introduced to Wonder Woman and she FINALLY has graced the big screen with her first solo film. After stealing the show from last years Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016), fans were eager to see her lead her own film and it’s safe to say DC have a winner film on their hands. Already the film is breaking box office records and holds a 93% rating from Rotten Tomatoes. Wonder Woman has grossed over $100 million at the US box office which was the biggest weekend opener for a female director (Patty Jenkins), hopefully this will be a step in the right direction for equality of female representation in film and behind the camera.

Without a doubt Wonder Woman is not only the best blockbuster of 2017 but one of the best superhero films in over 5 years. It was refreshing to see a standalone superhero film which allowed the leading character carry the film solo and completely smash it in the process, I think the last time there was a true standalone superhero film was probably The Dark Knight Rises (2012). Gal Gadot is beyond perfect as Diana, showcasing her amazing acting talent portraying Diana’s incredible character arc with conviction and depth. Diana stands for love, justice and peace and I loved key moments where she didn’t take things lying down but stood up for what she believed in and didn’t think twice about helping others. The action scenes were slick, empowering and epic.

Fast and Furious 8 may be the blockbuster where you switch your brain off and have fun, but Wonder Woman is a blockbuster with heart, depth, emotion AND epic fight sequences and is a true spectacle. It is possible to make a blockbuster with thrills audiences but is also thought provoking and empowering for all. I’m enjoying this moment seeing a superhero film with just one superhero at front and centre before Justice League and co. take over (I am looking forward to Justice League but it’s a sad thought not knowing when the next standalone superhero film will be released).


The exciting thing to note is that we still have the second half of 2017 to go in order to see what kind of blockbusters will be released. Even if it becomes a rubbish year for blockbusters overall (I doubt it) then at least 2017 gave us Wonder Woman.  

4 Biggest Blockbuster Disappointments Of 2017


We’re approaching the halfway mark through the year so I thought it would be appropriate to review the blockbusters that have been released in 2017, sadly it hasn’t been a great year. 2017 isn’t over yet so we still have some potential saving graces in the form of Wonder Woman, Justice League, Star Wars: The Last Jedi, Thor: Ragnarok etc. however I have to say that certain blockbusters that I have seen have not lived up to the hype.

If you want to look at 2017 UK film releases then you would include the multiple award winning films which have been my favourite films of the year, such as: La La Land, Moonlight, Lion, Jackie, Manchester By The Sea, Hidden Figures etc. and thank goodness for these beautiful films as I am starting to lose hope for big budgeted releases. I hope by the end of the year I am proven wrong and can say that great storytelling can be seen in all type of films.

Boring and the Beast


Let’s start off with one of the most underwhelming and highly overrated release: Beauty and the Beast. Firstly let me state that I am supportive of Disney giving their animated classics the live action treatment (as discussed in my previous post)however with the release of Beauty and the Beast; originality and creativity died and instead it assured Disney to play it safe with their upcoming live action releases. I was excited for the film before its release and I was rooting for Emma Watson as I thought she’d be perfect as Belle, however because the live action took no chances there was no room for mystery and excitement of what was to come in the film.

Interestingly enough the film has become a huge success, which sadly gives Disney permission to keep on playing it safe. The film has revived positive reviews (71% from Rotten Tomatoes) and the film has grossed over $1.2 billion worldwide making it the 10th highest grossing films of all time. Obviously the film has resonated with audiences, so I will respect those who loved the film however I can’t understand how this film has entered the top 10 of the most successful films of all time. I think I’ll stick to the original 1991 animation.

The NOT So Awesome Mix-Tape


I loved Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) and so did everyone else as the film became a fan favourite and raked in $773 million worldwide. It was unapologetic in how it delivered on the fun and it was an antidote to the ‘serious superhero film’. The sequel had a lot to live up to following the surprise smash hit first film.

After an exhaustive marketing campaign for the sequel the hype and excitement to see the film wore off, but I still wanted to see the film and I really wanted to enjoy it…yet it failed to deliver on the fun and thrills. It went down the cliche route that sequels tend to go down, take what was funny in the first film and crank it up to the highest volume. The comedy was too obvious and stupid at times. I liked Groot in the first film but did I really need to see a baby Groot figure out how to play music against the backdrop of a potentially cool action sequence? and the story was pretty underwhelming. That being said, there were some good some small moments between Gamora and Nebula as well as Yondu and Rocket, these moments allowed for some character development and appreciation. Also I think that Ayesha the Golden Priestess was underused and could have been the main villain.

Of course the film has become a huge success and has grossed over $799 million worldwide (and counting) as well as receiving positive reviews (81% from Rotten Toamtoes)so again there has been a disconnect from what audiences have felt and how I have responded to the film. However despite the fact the sequel wasn’t my favourite Marvel film I am excited for the third film and it will be interesting to see the characters in the upcoming Avengers films, so I haven’t given up on the Guardians of the Galaxy just yet.

Alien: The Pretend Sequel To Prometheus


I will hold my hands up and say I am not a die hard Alien fan, however I have seen Alien (1979), Aliens (1986) and Prometheus (2012) so I am familiar with the franchise. With Covenant promising to return to the horror element I was interested to see how this film would continue on with what was set out from Prometheus and how it would adopt a grittier and darker style from the previous Alien films. That was the problem, Ridley Scott has openly admitted that Covenant was addressing what die hard Alien fans disliked about Prometheus, basically because there was no huge weird alien lurking round a spaceship. When I watched Prometheus I hadn’t seen any Alien film and that was the time when marketing was saying how the film was not meant to be a direct prequel but a standalone film in the same universe, so I thought I was safe in watching it without feeling left out. Then all of a sudden it WAS part of the Alien franchise, meaning Covenant had to make some major changed to please Alien fans.

Covenant was released 5 years after Prometheus because they were trying to figure out whether to make a direct sequel to Prometheus or give in and be openly part of the Alien world. I was really looking forward to see Dr. Elizabeth Shaw meet the Engineers and find out questions that were posed in Prometheus, the tone of Prometheus was slick and futuristic but no without it’s shocking moments. All I got was some 5 minute YouTube video featuring Shaw and David and limp references to the “failed Prometheus trip”. I think that’s one of the main reasons why I didn’t love Covenant, because it tried to jump full throttle ahead of what was started in Prometheus and tried to connect this film to the Alien universe. However, I enjoyed some moments and Katherine Waterston was the best part about Covenant, and with THAT ending I’m definitely interested to see what Ridley Scott has planned for future instalments.

Kong: The Unnecessary Remake


For me the ultimate King Kong film is the 2005 remake directed by Oscar winning director Peter Jackson. I remember seeing that film in the cinemas when I was 12 and being blown away, scared and emotionally invested in what was happening in the film. I had to except that a new King Kong was inevitable as it’s not restricted to the 1933 classic nor the 2005 remake but it is a cultural pop icon meaning each generation will revisit the character. That being said I still didn’t see the point of a new Kong film, but that’s just my personal opinion.

I have to give credit to the 2017 film as it was doing its own thing and it wasn’t a remake of any Kong film, that at least allows itself to be set apart and judged on its own merit. The other factor which excited me was how it was set against the backdrop of 1970’s Vietnam war meaning it would be a colourful and vibrant take on the classic monster character. Not to mention a great cast consisting of Oscar winner Brie Larson, John Goodman, Samuel L. Jackson, Tom Hiddleston John C. Reilley etc. However what also retracted me from being full on excited for the film was how it was intended to be part of yet another cinematic universe.

Despite my reservations I have to say I was willing to go in with an open mind and enjoy the film, sadly I was right in not believing in the film. The script was so weak and it was painful seeing brilliant actors deliver superficial and unimagined lines, the story wasn’t engaging and the characters weren’t exactly three dimensional. Yes it’s not a type of film where it requires deep exploration of character however even if it’s up to a popcorn film level standard there has to be some reason to invest and care for any character, sadly I could not have cared less about the fate of the characters. I was most disappointed in Brie Larson as it was such a superficial role that it didn’t live up to the whole ‘having a three dimensional female character in a blockbuster film’, of course it was sad to see them all play uninspired characters.

Again, a blockbuster I didn’t like made money and critics had good things to say about the film; grossing $565 million worldwide and received a 77% rating 77% rating from Rotten Tomatoes.

The only thing I took away from the 2017 version was to watch the Oscar winning 2005 version.

Hopefully with the release of the already positively reviewed Wonder Woman and future releases in the form of Thor: Ragnarok and Star Wars: The Last Jedi we can reflect upon the year and say there were some standout blockbusters in 2017.

For the next blog post I’ll be writing about the few blockbusters that have actually caught my interest, there’ll be a few surprises in there for you of which blockbusters I loved this year.

Let’s Talk About The Ending Of ‘Nocturnal Animals’ (2016)



Nocturnal Animals (2016) is a really interesting film directed by Golden Globe and BAFTA nominated director Tom Ford; it tells the tale of Susan (Amy Adams) receiving a book from ex-husband Edward (Jake Gyllenhaal) which accounts dark and violent themes which makes Susan re-evaluate her life and relationships.

It’s not a perfect film but there’s a lot I admire and respect about it. I loved seeing Amy Adams in this kind of role; she wasn’t playing a likeable character or a character finding redemption but who is living in the shadows of her regrettable actions. Another thing I admired (and had to watch again to fully understand) was how Edward’s book mirrored his relationship with Susan.

Whilst not being perfect, Nocturnal Animals still captivated me by the elegant visuals and music and the hopefulness of seeing resolve and a satisfying conclusion. However the film ends abruptly and you feel like you’ve been lured in by the film only to be dropped suddenly with no warning. At first I was frustrated which evolved into perceiving the ending as a genius move; it shows the power of the film to have an audience feel so invested and immersed in the experience.

Remove The Armour


Sometimes the best moments are found in the most subtle moments. Over the course of the film Susan has been depicted as unhappy and full of regret, yet she is a successful art gallery owner and she feels some guilt of not feeling happy about her success. She has become a different person from the Susan that we were introduced to in the flashbacks telling the story of the early years of her relationship with Edward. One could argue that in order to mask the hurt and unhappiness from her actions in life she puts on a front looking like she has it all together.

Then there’s a great moment where she removes her lipstick, and a brief smile follows. That simple action was like she was removing the armour that she has been wearing ever since the colossal downfall of her marriage with Edward. It could be argued that she’s hoping to find happiness again by removing her wedding ring and hoping that by reconnecting with him the wrongs of her past can be rectified.

It’s a powerful shot, a dark room with only Susan’s reflection in the mirror to show. Amy Adams can do so much with no words, it’s all in the facial expressions and the lingering shots that convey how she is thinking the evening will go. Will she recapture who she was before and will she learn from her mistakes if she gets a second chance?

The Wait


This is the moment we’ve all been waiting for: seeing Edward in present day meet up with Susan. After everything that has happened what would they say to each other? The anticipation was high and personally I was intrigued to see how they would act around each other.

Susan rocks up to the most fancy restaurant and is seated at her table, she looks to the door excited to see Edward walk through the door and reconnect. This scene is laid out to be an expected conversational scene, potentially reflecting an earlier scene when they met up for the first time in a restaurant. There’s even a moment where we hear the waitress welcome a gentlemen whilst focusing on Susan’s face, we even hear footsteps only to be let down by finding out it wasn’t Edward. Both the audience and Susan had their hopes built up only to be let down.

Alas, hope fades and reality kicks in as time passes and Edward is nowhere to be seen. From the melted ice in her drink to the fading of her smile to the striking of her bare finger where she removed her wedding ring, Susan detects that this meet up isn’t going to plan.

There Are No Words


The music by Abel Korzeniowski only amplifies the mood of this scene, starting with some beautiful elegant music which escalates into a more intense sound conveying the rising emotions and tragedy that follows. The heightened sound calms down into the simple sounds of the piano keys, until there is music no more whilst the camera fixates on the heartbroken face of Susan.

The film score perfectly conveys all the emotions that Susan is feeling as no words are spoken. The reason why the music is so elegant and beautiful at the beginning is because there is still hope and an uncertainty of what is to follow, this develops into a more intense sound because there is a worry that there won’t be any resolve for the scene. It’s that scary moment because there may not be a chance of reconciliation, but we can’t give up hope just yet. Then the simple piano key sounds matched with Susan’s distraught face only equates into one thing: She will have to live with the mistakes she has made for the rest of her life. It’s a incredible simple yet powerful moment where the penny has dropped for Susan and she knows there is no turning back and that there’s nothing she can do to make Edward forgive her.

Because there are no spoken words we see Amy Adams give an acting masterclass of saying so much through no dialogue. From her eye glances to her many facial expressions conveying hope, sadness, regret, uncertainty etc. As an audience member you are fixated on her face as you want to try and understand everything that Susan is feeling in that moment. Amy Adams does this perfectly and with the music to support her it all equals to an emotionally powerful and delicate scene.




I loved the bold ending of showing Susan to have no redemption in her character arc. You watch the whole film seeing how Susan is living a life of deep regret which prevents her from finding peace and happiness even though on paper she has her life together. I love Amy Adams, she is one of the best actors around and I loved how she played a character who wasn’t meant to be likeable. Amy Adams played a character who not only makes mistakes but will never have the chance to make things right or tragically may not find happiness because our actions have consequences. It’s bold just leaving Susan alone in that restaurant letting everything sink in.

What did you think of the ending? Did you appreciate what Tom Ford was going for or would you like to have had more of a concrete ending. Feel free to comment and share your opinions.

3 Things Disney Need To Do In Order To Make The Live Action Remakes Work

Disney are riding high on the back of mega successful films that have easily sailed past the $1 billion worldwide mark at the worldwide box office; this is including the acquisition of LucasFilms Ltd. in 2012 leading to the release of Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015) which crossed over $2 billion worldwide at the worldwide box office. In addition to the Marvel Cinematic Universe where each film keeps raking in the money; Disney have now hit the jackpot by giving beloved animated classics the live action treatment.

Most recently Beauty and the Beast (2017) reached the $1 billion worldwide milestone, meaning it is now the highest grossing musical of all time. Alice in Wonderland (2010) was the first Disney live action remake to reach that milestone and since then each remake has made a lot of money. So why write an article stating that Disney need to consider these 3 points to make the remakes work? Because it’s starting to feel like we’re giving critics of remakes a reason to hate them since Disney are playing it safe and not taking any risks.

1. Take Risks


Alice in Wonderland (2010) and Maleficient (2014) received mixed reviews but made a lot of money for Disney. It could be argued that the success of these two remakes is down to the fact that Disney changed up the well known story lines and brought something fresh and unique to the table.

Alice in Wonderland cerated Alice into a warrior and injected a bit more action and adventure into the mix, meaning that it wasn’t trying to stomp over the 1951 animated classic but be set apart. Maleficent switched up the tale of Sleeping Beauty (1959) and allowed audiences to see a more complex and three dimensional character in Maleficent, it helped having Oscar winning actress Angelina Jolie bring depth to the eponymous character.

The danger Disney are in at the minute is with recent box office smash hit Beauty and the Beast they can see that playing it safe works for them. There have been rumours regarding Mulan where they might not use the songs from the 1998 animation and people thought this was a bad idea; my response to them is, “why don’t you want Disney to bring a fresh perspective to a beloved animation?” If you make the remakes too similar too the animations people will instantly compare the two when the remakes should represent the fact that they honour the animations whilst bringing their own spin on a well known tale.

(Since the rumours of Mulan featuring no songs emerged it has since been claimed that there will in fact be music….let’s hope it’s not a shot for shot take of the original like how they remade Beauty and the Beast)

2. Cast Directors With Diverse Styles


Many would argue that Alice in Wonderland isn’t Tim Burton’s strongest work, yet no one deny the auteurship of Oscar nominee Tim Burton. His visual style is what sets him apart and adding in a dash of the gothic nature doesn’t hurt in making a well known tale your own.

Even Oscar nominee Kenneth Branagh directing Cinderella (2015) was a brilliant move, a director of his gravitas managing to stay true to what we loved about the original whilst making tweaks and managing to stand alongside the animated classic. Unlike Beauty and the Beast where it was a shot for shot remake (apart from those boring original songs everyone has probably forgotten about).

It’s exciting news to hear Niki Caro (Whale Rider – 2002) has been announced to direct the live action adaptation of Mulan (which will be released in November 2018). Bring a female director on board to this tale of an empowering heroine is a great move on Disney, however I’m hoping that she will take risks and make it an exciting action adventure ride that it could potentially be.

Bill Condon comes from a musical background so fair enough he played to his strengths with the Beauty and the Beast live action remake, however I hope that Disney allow each director to play to their strengths so all the remakes don’t feel similar or uninspired.

3. Know Which Animations To Give The Live Action Treatment


I am not against remakes/sequels/reboots at all, but only if there is a need or a way to bring it back in a new and exciting way. With Alice in Wonderland, Maleficient and even Cinderella they all came back more fleshed out and gave reason for audiences to watch them again in a new format.

However this could be dangerous in making Disney throw away aims to create original work and revisit the films that made them who they are today. Just think about it; there are over 50 animations that Disney have made and worryingly there is a growing list of animations being given the live action treatment. Do we really need a Lion King remake? With the 1994 classic still engrained in our minds today with the help of the still popular Broadway/West End show? Dumbo is a classic which is 76 years old and it’s still arguably popular today, can’t we leave it in the past and is there really a demand to see it brought back to the big screen?

Of course all of these points are subjective and everyone will have their own opinion of which animations is deemed worthy of being made into a live action film, however the principal still stands that Disney should be more selective in their animations to remake. This would make the current remakes more impactful and special, now the notion of remaking a beloved Disney animation has lost its shine.


In conclusion, I’m all for a Disney animated live action remake only if there is a need to do so and only if there is a way to make it unique and different to make it worth my while to watch it again. They can’t keep doing what they did with Beauty and the Beast, because in all honesty I wouldn’t bother with the live action again and I’d go straight to the 1991 animated classic. Let’s hope that Disney don’t lose that curious spirit to try new things when giving their own animations the live action treatment:

“We keep moving forward, opening new doors, and doing new things, because we’re curious and curiosity keeps leading us down new paths.”

Beauty and the Beast (2017) Film Review

3/5 stars

Unless you’ve also been trapped in Beast’s castle then you’ll know that Disney are hard at work by revisiting their animated classics in live action format. This can be traced back to the billion dollar grossing Alice in Wonderland (2010) which was followed by Maleficent in 2014. Not crediting Cinderella (2015) completely to Disney’s now traditional approach to revisiting its animated classics, however since then we’ve seen Disney take less risks with remaking its animations.

Ever since the beginning of 2015 when Emma Watson was cast as Belle in the live action Beauty and the Beast, the hype has been high and audiences have been eagerly awaiting Disney’s new interpretation of it’s 1991 classic. For years I’ve been looking forward to this film, but months before once all of the promotional material was being released I had this sense that it wouldn’t be the grand and extravagant remake I was hoping for…sadly I was right.



Starting with the positives I thought the film looked the part. Visually it was eye catching and I thought they captured the look and vibe of the original quite well. The characters of Lumière, Cogsworth, Mrs. Potts, Chip etc. were all effortlessly integrated with the live action characters (something I felt that The Jungle Book – 2016 failed to do with its CGI animals and live action characters) and I thought those characters were fun to watch and it wasn’t a huge let down from the animated versions of these characters.

With $462 million worldwide (against a $160 million budget) at the Box Office (so far) and with a 70% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, fans are clearly loving this film (for some reason). It is a tale that is as old as time (1991 feels like a century ago to most people) and since the animation’s release it has always been a part of people’s childhoods and it has grown up with people still retaining it’s relevant and popular appeal. My worry is that now Disney see that being unoriginal and not taking chances works, they’ll rehash it’s upcoming live action adaptations. I guess from a business point of view fair enough but where are the visionaries that want to do something exciting and new meaning that it can stand side by side with the originals and now replace them.



If I had to single one performance out as the most committed and most convincing it was Luke Evans as Gaston. He played the arrogant bachelor to perfection, down to his singing and characterisation it was flawless. Out of all the cast I felt Luke Evans was the only one who gave 100% and the scenes with him in were more exciting than others…and that’s saying something when you’re meant to be watching the film for the leading performances of Belle and Beast.


Speaking of the cast; Emma Watson is a great actress (she was amazing in Perks of being a Wallflower -2012 and The Bling Ring – 2013) and on paper she IS Belle. However, there were moments (especially the first half or so) where her performance felt half hearted. I know she’s singing about how everyone are peasants and she’s superior to everyone but even the animated Belle seemed more kind to the locals and in general the animated Belle was more fun to watch. It was rise and fall with Emma’s performance; the iconic ballroom scene and when she goes back to her provincial town to rescue her father were the highlights of her performance. She wasn’t bad but I expected more from her (no offence but after watching her performance as Belle I’m happy she dropped out of La La Land – 2016 for Oscar winner Emma Stone to replace her). I would say Dan Stevens as the Beast was slightly better with his performance, but I would argue that the animation team who worked on his look did an amazing job of effortlessly blending his character with the live action characters. Overall, not exactly the most exciting leading couple that have graced our screens.



I will be that person that says that the animation is far more superior than the 2017 live action remake. The original is more atmospheric, dramatic, emotional, heartwarming and grand in everything from its characters to the look of the film. In 1992 Beauty and the Beast became the first animation to be nominated an Oscar for Best Picture, I seriously doubt this new version will have anywhere near that same impact today. This is why it should have done differently so that it honours the original but offers something new to today’s audience. Scenes like when Belle runs on the hill and sings, Beast offering Belle the library, even the iconic ballroom dance scene etc. were adapted half heartedly and it almost felt like they were just there because the audience were expecting them to feature in the film. The animation did all of those scenes and more with a sense of grandeur and wonder. The danger rehashing everything from the animation is the audience knows what to expect so there’s no sense of mystery and wonder.


I understand that director Bill Condon was unapologetic about honouring the 1991 animation with only the addition of a few new songs (which added nothing new to the film) and Emma Watson’s few tweaks (which were hardly revolutionary to the character) however I would have loved it if Disney took a risk and brought something new to the table. The reason why Alice in Wonderland (2010) and Maleficent (2014) worked so well, in my opinion, was because they took a new approach to a tale that in embedded in our brains from childhood. I have no issues with remakes, only if they offer something unique and something that is worth watching again in a different format. I would have loved to see Guillermo del Toro’s version as he definitely would have bright a refreshing take of a tale so universally known and loved. Sadly he departed from the project a few years ago making way for Bill Condon to direct his unoriginal remake.

I’ve heard about a live action update for several years and I thought the decision to approach the remake in a more traditional manner was more down to the the success of Cinderella (2015) however I read that Bill Condon decided to take less chances after the success of Frozen (2013):


“Before I arrived, they were rethinking Beauty and the Beast more radically, more like Snow White and the Huntsman. There was a lot of conversation about the War of the Austrian Succession that didn’t interest me. But then after Frozen opened, the studio saw that there was this big international audience for an old-school-musical approach. But initially they said, “We’re interested in a musical to a degree, but only half full of songs.” My interest was taking that film and doing it in this new medium — live action — as a full-on musical movie. So I backed out for a minute, and they came back and said, “No, no, no, we get it, let’s pursue it that way.” 

Even without Guillermo del Toro we could have seen a more radical and exciting version of Beauty and the Beast, because the story is far bigger than Disney itself so why not try something new?

I’ve expressed my fears for what impact the success of this film may have, however overall I would say it’s a enjoyable film which is easy and fun to watch. But it’s worrying that 26 years later Disney we’re basically seeing Disney revisit their greatest hits in the most unoriginal way possible. My advice is watch this film so you can tick it off your list, it’s not a total waste of your time, but please watch the original animation as it’s far more impactful than the 2017 version.